Hollywood churns out large amounts of crap every year. There’s
no secret as to why. Crap sells. Just look at the Transformers franchise. Or
the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Or the Avengers. You don’t need a good
script, talented actors, or beautiful cinematography to sell tickets. You just
need plenty of explosions, silly costumes, and fast-food toy tie-ins.
Given the paragraph above I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that Blade Runner 2049’s
opening weekend was only $32M on a budget of $150M. I’m just disappointed. The
film deserves a lot better. In an era of unnecessary reboots and sequels, this
movie proves to be an exception. Blade
Runner 2049 is one of the best films I’ve seen in years. Even people that
aren’t familiar with the 1982 cult-classic that spawned this follow-up will
enjoy Blade Runner 2049. It’s sci-fi for
smart people. It’s a film that makes you think while also acting as amazing eye
candy. Yet fewer people paid to see it this past weekend than paid to see much
lesser recent sequels like Kingsman: The
Golden Circle or Annabelle: Creation.
Like the original Blade
Runner, this movie asks some interesting questions. Does where we come from define us? If you’re
human in virtually every aspect other than the nature of your birth, does that difference
give someone the right to own you? Is our species’ prioritization of profit over planet doomed to destroy us?
Director Denis Villeneuve deftly took the reins from Ridley
Scott and with the help of cinematographer Roger Deakins and screenwriter Hampton
Fancher has created a worthy successor to what I consider the greatest sci-fi film ever made.
I won’t give away any of the plot, but the cast including
Ryan Gosling, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Jared Leto, Robin Wright, and the original
blade runner, Harrison Ford are all excellent. Hans Zimmer’s score retains the
flavor of Vangelis’ fantastic work from 1982, and if Roger Deakins isn’t nominated
for an Oscar for his camera work, there is no justice come awards season.
I saw the movie in IMAX and I’m glad I did. Yes, the tickets
aren’t cheap, but this is one of those films that’s so chock full of stuff to
look at, the bigger the screen, the better. With the amount of critical praise it’s
receiving and a current Rotten Tomatoes score of 89, maybe Blade Runner 2049 will prove to be a slow burn. I hope so. It’s the
type of movie I’d like to see Hollywood make more of. It deserves a bigger audience.
If you enjoyed films like the original Blade Runner, Interstellar,
Moon, Gattaca, or Villeneuve’s other recent sci-fi effort, Arrival, go see this one. It’s
2 hours 43 minutes well spent.
No comments:
Post a Comment